Reports

See where perspectives agree and differ

Feedback is useful when people can understand it. FeedbackMount reports bring together observed strengths, differences in perception and behaviours to explore next.

Compare self-assessment with others' observations

See how a person views their behaviours alongside feedback from colleagues. A missing self-assessment is shown as missing; it is not used to create a misleading gap against zero.

Self-assessment · Others’ averageFictional data
Δ 1.7 DelegationCommunicationDecision-makingCoachingothersCollaboration
Self-assessment Others’ average
Self-assessment compared with the average of others’ ratings, from 1 to 5. Fictional data.
Show the values
CompetencySelf-assessmentOthers’ average
Delegation4.42.7
Communication3.83.9
Decision-making3.63.6
Coaching others4.03.1
Collaboration3.94.1

Keep meaningful differences visible

An overall average can hide an important distinction between groups. The report preserves manager, peer and direct-report perspectives.

A fictional illustration: A manager rates delegation positively while a group of direct reports gives lower ratings. The difference suggests a useful topic for conversation: how does delegation feel to the people receiving the work?

The report does not decide which group's perspective is correct or diagnose the reason for a difference.

DelegationFictional data

An average can hide the difference

Average rating from 1 to 5

Manager1 · attributable
4.2
Peers6 · anonymous
3.0
Direct reports8 · anonymous
2.2

Overall average: 2.7

An average can hide the difference. Delegation — Manager 4.2, Peers 3.0, Direct reports 2.2; Overall average 2.7. Fictional data.

Explore charts with a clear explanation

Radar charts compare suitable competencies. Colour-coded competency tables help readers inspect patterns across the questionnaire. Written explanations accompany the visual information; a missing value is never shown as a low score.

CompetencyFictional data
CompetencySelf-assessmentManagerPeersDirect reports
Delegation4.44.23.02.2
Communication3.84.03.93.8
Decision-making3.63.93.63.5
Coaching others4.03.43.1Withheld
Collaboration3.94.24.14.0
HigherLower Withheld
Average ratings by rater group, from 1 to 5. Withheld cells have too few responses to show safely. Fictional data.

Read comments in context

AI-assisted narrative themes provide an overview drawn from reviewed comments. These themes complement the quantitative report; they do not replace people's observations or human review.

Know when a comparison is meaningful

Each cycle retains its questionnaire version. Reports identify changes that affect a comparison, such as a different question or behaviour description. Revised reports preserve earlier versions, so people can see which information informed a goal.

See where to offer support across departments

The organisation attention heatmap covers any surveyed topic. It highlights low scores, departments below the rest of the organisation, changes over time, manager/team perspective gaps and behaviours colleagues cannot observe.

Typically, a department needs about 10 or more people receiving feedback, plus sufficient raters and answers, before it can appear. Smaller groups and unsafe comparisons are hidden. The view supports a conversation about where to offer help; it is not an individual report, manager scorecard, ranking or prediction.

Organisation attention heatmapFictional data
Survey topicSalesOperationsFinanceProductSupportLegal
Reporting suspicious messagesCybersecurity behaviour3.92.3 — Needs attention4.13.83.6Hidden: group too small
Delegation3.73.53.33.4 — Falling over time3.8
Communication3.83.63.93.44.0

Operations · Cybersecurity behaviour (Reporting suspicious messages): 2.3 — Needs attention

HigherLower Needs attention Falling over time Hidden: group too small
Organisation attention heatmap — Fictional data. Average rating from 1 to 5.

Have a question about your programme? Contact us.

Book a demo