Sample report · Fictional data

Explore how a report supports a development conversation

This sample uses fictional people and feedback. It illustrates how the report explains perspectives and guides a practical next step; it does not describe a customer outcome.

Sample reportFictional data

Rater groups

  • Self-assessment: 1
  • Manager: 1 (attributable)
  • Peers: 6 (anonymous)
  • Direct reports: 8 (anonymous)

Start with strengths and differences

Read the self-assessment alongside feedback from others. Use charts and their written explanations to explore where perspectives agree and where they differ. Missing observations are identified rather than presented as low scores.

Self-assessment · Others’ averageFictional data
Δ 1.7 DelegationCommunicationDecision-makingCoachingothersCollaboration
Self-assessment Others’ average
Self-assessment compared with the average of others’ ratings, from 1 to 5. Fictional data.
Show the values
CompetencySelf-assessmentOthers’ average
Delegation4.42.7
Communication3.83.9
Decision-making3.63.6
Coaching others4.03.1
Collaboration3.94.1
DelegationFictional data

An average can hide the difference

Average rating from 1 to 5

Manager1 · attributable
4.2
Peers6 · anonymous
3.0
Direct reports8 · anonymous
2.2

Overall average: 2.7

An average can hide the difference. Delegation — Manager 4.2, Peers 3.0, Direct reports 2.2; Overall average 2.7. Fictional data.

Notice what is withheld

Some groups or values cannot be shown safely. A missing comparison can reflect insufficient feedback or an anonymity rule; it should not be interpreted as a negative rating.

CompetencyFictional data
CompetencySelf-assessmentManagerPeersDirect reports
Delegation4.44.23.02.2
Communication3.84.03.93.8
Decision-making3.63.93.63.5
Coaching others4.03.43.1Withheld
Collaboration3.94.24.14.0
HigherLower Withheld
Average ratings by rater group, from 1 to 5. Withheld cells have too few responses to show safely. Fictional data.

Connect a finding to an action

Choose a behaviour to develop, agree a practical goal and add milestones. A later Progress Check revisits the chosen skills.

GoalFictional data

Agree the expected outcome and decision boundaries when handing over a task

  • From the report: Delegation
  • Due: 15 March
  • In progress
Milestones: 1 of 3
  1. Agree decision boundaries with the teamDone
  2. Practise in two project handoversIn progress
  3. Ask colleagues what has changedNext
Progress CheckFictional data

Direct reports’ rating for delegation

First report
2.2
Progress Check
3.1

Colleagues report a change. This does not establish what caused it.

Direct reports’ rating for delegation: First report 2.2, Progress Check 3.1. Ratings from the same colleagues, from 1 to 5. Fictional data.

Discuss the sample with us

Book a guided demo to explore the report in the wider workflow, including nomination, participant tasks, goals and follow-up.

Book a demo